Tag Archives: Pillar 3 reporting blog series

Annual QRTs: Getting it right first time, every time

This blog is part of the Pillar 3 Reporting series. For more blogs in this series click here.

Over the next few weeks, companies will be finalising their first sets of annual Quantitative Reporting Templates (QRTs) to be submitted under Solvency II. For companies with a financial year-end of 31 December, the reporting deadline is 20 May 2017.

A key part of preparing the annual (or quarterly) QRTs is ensuring the accuracy of the information provided. In this blog post, we highlight some validation processes available to companies.

In recent speaking engagements and publications, the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) has underlined the importance of ensuring that the supervisory returns are validated and that there is appropriate governance in place so that the directors, who sign off on the annual QRTs, are satisfied that the returns are accurate and complete. In its recent Insurance Quarterly bulletin, the CBI stated that its ‘experience to date has shown that successfully meeting the dual requirements of “fit for purpose” and “right first time” requires firms to manage much better the governance and operational risks around the reporting process.’

Pressure to put in place a validation and governance process also comes from the board as the annual QRTs must be approved at a board level under the Solvency II text. In addition, in Ireland three named directors are required to submit an accuracy certificate on the annual QRTs. The CBI points out that ‘while those signing off returns may not be the people reviewing them, they should ensure that they have a clear process that they can rely on.’

Continue reading

SFCR: Some more reports published

This blog is part of the Pillar 3 Reporting series. For more blogs in this series, click here.

Two new Solvency and Financial Condition Reports (SFCRs) were published in the past week. In both cases, the financial reporting date is 31 December 2016, representing an impressive turnaround time for public disclosure. They are both useful examples of Group SFCRs:

• St. James’s Place Group prepared a single SFCR encompassing the public disclosures for the Group and all of the solo entities within the Group with two life company subsidiaries.
• ASR understood it is a Group SFCR and so each of the solo entities has prepared separate SFCRs. ASR has published the public Quantitative Reporting Templates (QRTs) in a separate document which is available on the same web page as the SFCR report.

Company Link Country Reporting Date
St James’s Place Group Link UK 31/12/2016
ASR Group Link

Link

Netherlands 31/12/2016

SFCR: A taste of what’s out there

This blog is the first part of a series on Pillar 3 reporting for Solvency II.

For most companies with a 31 December year-end, the first annual reporting deadline under Solvency II is on 20 May 2017. In preparation for this I think it’s interesting to look at some of the first examples of published Solvency and Financial Condition Reports (SFCRs).

What does an SFCR really look like?

To date, a number of companies with year-ends before 31 December have published their reports and I have included links below:

Company Link Country Reporting Date
Evolution Insurance Company Ltd Link Gibraltar 30/06/2016
Vitality Life Ltd Link UK 30/06/2016
The Wren Insurance Association Ltd Link UK 30/06/2016
Care Insurance Co Link Gibraltar 30/06/2016
Cornish Mutual Assurance Co Ltd Link UK 30/06/2016
Euroguard Insurance Co PCC Ltd Link Gibraltar 30/06/2016
Hansard Europe dac Link Ireland 30/06/2016
International Diving Assurance Ltd Link Malta 30/06/2016
Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd Link UK 30/06/2016

While clearly a small sample, there is a variety of company types, lines of business, and territories represented in the selection above. In addition to the Solvency II requirements themselves, looking at what others have published can provide a useful reference point as you prepare your own SFCR report. As a health warning, it should be noted that these SFCRs represent approaches taken by some individual companies and can’t yet be taken as established market practice. We also have no feedback yet on the expectations and views of the various European supervisors.

Differences in approach

While the Solvency II requirements are generally clear on what should be included in the SFCR, as always there is scope for different interpretations. Furthermore, it is a general principle that the SFCR should be proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of the undertaking. It is therefore reasonable to expect variations in the length and level of detail in these reports. It is worth remembering that the SFCR is a public document for policyholders and other key stakeholders.

How long is a piece of string?
Looking at the nine publicly available SFCRs mentioned above, there is a wide variation in length, with the shortest report coming in at 24 pages, while the longest is 73 pages.
The longest section on average is the System of Governance chapter (B), while the shortest section is on Capital Management (E).

 Number of pages Average Min Max
A. Business and Performance 4.1 1.5 7.0
B. System of Governance 8.9 3.0 17.0
C. Risk Profile 5.4 1.5 10.0
D. Valuation for Solvency Purposes 4.9 2.0 10.0
E. Capital Management 3.0 1.0 5.5
Appendix: Public QRTs 19.1 5.0 39.5
Total 45.3 24.0 73.0

Layout
Generally, the SFCRs follow the order of required contents set out in the Level 2 Delegated Regulations Article 292 to 297, and the corresponding Level 3 Guidelines (with Chapters A to E, and subsections A1, A2, and so on). I think this is a sensible structure as it is easy for the reader to follow and ensures consistency across the industry.

Where a particular reporting requirement doesn’t apply to a company, most SFCRs still include the section and give a reason why it is not applicable. In cases where firms simply skip the section, it becomes difficult for the reader to determine whether it is not relevant or whether they didn’t complete it for another reason.

You are required to disclose your public quantitative reporting templates (QRTs) together with your SFCR. In almost all cases, the public QRTs are included as an Appendix.

Presentation
As a publicly available document, some companies have ensured their SFCRs are consistent with their brand and other policyholder documentation—Vitality Life is a useful example here. On the other hand, a number of other companies have taken a more functional approach, with very little additional formatting. This choice probably depends on how likely policyholders are to access your SFCR and whether you view it as marketing material.

Continue reading